Establishing Fault in Intersection Collisions During a New Jersey Car Accident Lawsuit

An intersection car accident in NJ often leaves both drivers convinced they had the right of way. One driver says the light was green. The other says the same. A left-turning driver believes the gap was safe. The oncoming driver says there was no time to stop.

These conflicting accounts make intersection collisions some of the most heavily disputed cases in New Jersey personal injury litigation.

New Jersey's right-of-way statutes, traffic signal laws, and modified comparative negligence standard create a framework for resolving these disputes. Fault is rarely binary. The question in most intersection cases is not simply who was wrong, but how responsibility is divided and what evidence supports each side's version of events. Our New Jersey car accident lawyers are skilled at navigating these complexities.

Key Takeaways for Intersection Car Accident NJ Claims

  • N.J.S.A. 39:4-90 establishes three distinct right-of-way rules at intersections, including a specific duty for left-turning drivers to yield to oncoming traffic
  • New Jersey's modified comparative negligence standard under N.J.S.A. 2A:15-5.1 allows a jury to assign fault percentages to each driver, and recovery is barred only when the plaintiff's share exceeds 50%
  • A green light does not automatically eliminate fault if a driver entered the intersection at excessive speed, failed to keep a proper lookout, or could have avoided the collision through reasonable care
  • Traffic camera footage, dashcam video, police reports, and accident reconstruction analysis often determine the outcome when both drivers claim the other ran the light
  • NJDOT traffic monitoring cameras, private surveillance systems, and dashcam recordings may capture intersection collisions

Three Right-of-Way Rules That Shape Every Intersection Case

New Jersey's right-of-way statute, N.J.S.A. 39:4-90 , contains three rules that apply at intersections. Each one addresses a different scenario, and the facts of the crash determine which rule controls the liability analysis.

The First Vehicle Into the Intersection Has Priority

A driver approaching an intersection must yield to a vehicle that has already entered it. This rule applies regardless of which direction the other vehicle is traveling. If one driver entered the intersection first and the second driver failed to yield, the second driver may bear primary fault for the collision.

Timing matters here. Disputes over who entered the intersection first are common, and the resolution often depends on physical evidence like skid marks, vehicle resting positions, and the point of impact on each vehicle.

When Two Vehicles Enter at the Same Time

When two vehicles reach an intersection simultaneously, the driver on the left must yield to the driver on the right. This rule governs uncontrolled intersections and situations where both drivers approach at the same moment.

Fault under this rule may hinge on whether either driver was traveling at a speed that prevented them from yielding. If the driver on the left entered the intersection without slowing or checking for cross traffic, the violation of this statutory duty becomes a central element of the liability case.

The Left Turn Yield Rule

The third rule addresses one of the most common intersection collision scenarios. A driver intending to turn left must yield to oncoming vehicles that are within the intersection or close enough to pose an immediate hazard. However, the statute also provides that once the left-turning driver has yielded and signaled, other vehicles approaching from the opposite direction must yield to the driver making the turn.

This two-part structure creates a frequent source of disputed liability. The left-turning driver may argue that they checked for oncoming traffic and began the turn safely. The oncoming driver may argue that the turn was made directly into their path. Resolving this dispute requires evidence of each driver's speed, position, and timing relative to the intersection.

What Happens When Both Drivers Say They Had the Green Light?

Disputed signal status is one of the most common evidentiary challenges in intersection collision cases. Both drivers tell their insurance companies and attorneys that the light was green. Without independent evidence, the case reduces to competing credibility.

New Jersey's traffic signal statute, N.J.S.A. 39:4-105 , defines what each signal color requires. Green permits a driver to proceed, subject to the safety of others. Red requires a complete stop before the intersection. Yellow requires the driver to stop unless the vehicle is too close to the intersection to do so safely, with the statute defining fifty feet as a safe stopping distance at twenty miles per hour.

These definitions become legally significant when a crash occurs during a signal transition. A driver who enters the intersection on a late yellow, just as cross traffic receives a green, may share fault with the driver who accelerated into the intersection without confirming it was clear. Neither driver may be entirely at fault, and the percentage split depends on what the evidence shows about each driver's actions in the seconds before the impact.

Evidence That May Resolve a Disputed Signal Intersection Collision

When both drivers claim a green light, the case often turns on evidence from sources outside the vehicles.

  • NJDOT traffic monitoring cameras may capture intersection activity, though these cameras monitor traffic flow rather than enforce violations. Footage retention is limited, making prompt requests essential.
  • Private surveillance cameras at nearby businesses, residential doorbell cameras, and dashcam recordings from either vehicle or uninvolved drivers frequently provide the clearest evidence of signal status at the moment of impact. An attorney may issue preservation letters to prevent this footage from being overwritten.
  • Witness statements from pedestrians, other motorists, or passengers help corroborate or challenge each driver's account.
  • Accident reconstruction analysis, when needed, evaluates vehicle speeds, point of impact, damage patterns, and signal timing data to reconstruct the sequence of events with a degree of precision that witness memory alone does not provide.

Each source of evidence narrows the gap between competing accounts and strengthens the foundation for allocating fault.

How Comparative Negligence Applies to Intersection Collisions in NJ

New Jersey follows a modified comparative negligence standard under N.J.S.A. 2A:15-5.1. A jury assigns a percentage of fault to each driver involved in the accident, and the plaintiff may recover damages as long as their share of fault does not exceed 50%. At 51% or more, recovery could be barred entirely. When fault is shared, the plaintiff's award is reduced proportionally by their percentage of responsibility. For more on how this affects your case, see our article on comparative fault in NJ personal injury cases.

A Green Light Does Not Equal Zero Fault

Many drivers assume that having the green light means they bear no responsibility for an intersection collision. That assumption is incorrect under New Jersey law.

A green light permits a driver to proceed, but the statute conditions that permission on the safety of others. A driver who enters an intersection on green but at excessive speed, while distracted, or without observing cross traffic, may still be assigned a percentage of fault. If the driver had time to see the other vehicle and take evasive action but failed to do so, comparative negligence may apply.

This analysis becomes particularly significant in T-bone collisions where the striking driver had the green light, but the evidence shows the other vehicle was already in the intersection and visible for several seconds before the impact. The question shifts from who had the right of way to whether each driver acted reasonably given what they could see.

How Fault Percentages Are Determined

Juries consider several factors when allocating fault between drivers in an intersection collision. These factors include:

  • Which driver had the right of way under N.J.S.A. 39:4-90 or N.J.S.A. 39:4-105
  • The speed each driver was traveling relative to the posted limit and road conditions
  • Whether either driver was distracted, impaired, or failed to maintain a proper lookout
  • The visibility at the intersection, including obstructions, weather, and lighting conditions
  • Whether either driver took evasive action or had an opportunity to avoid the collision

A 70/30 fault split produces a very different outcome than a 50/50 split. Defense attorneys in intersection cases frequently argue comparative negligence to shift enough fault to reduce or eliminate the plaintiff's recovery.

How Do T-Bone Collisions Raise Unique Liability Questions?

Side-impact or T-bone collisions most often occur at intersections when one vehicle enters the path of another traveling on a perpendicular road. The striking vehicle impacts the side of the other, where structural protection is minimal, and occupants face elevated injury risk.

Damage location often tells the story faster than either driver's account. A T-bone impact to the rear quarter panel of a turning vehicle may suggest the turn was nearly complete before the collision, pointing toward the oncoming driver's fault for excessive speed or failure to yield. An impact directly at the driver's door may suggest the turning vehicle pulled into oncoming traffic with insufficient clearance.

Left Turn Liability and Evidence of Fault

Left-turn T-bone collisions are among the most litigated intersection scenarios. "The left-turning driver has a statutory duty to yield under N.J.S.A. 39:4-90, and a failure to yield is strong evidence of fault. However, the left-turning driver can still present evidence showing the oncoming driver's conduct also contributed to the crash.

The left-turning driver may present evidence that the oncoming vehicle was traveling well over the speed limit, making it impossible to judge the closing distance accurately. The evidence may also show the left-turner began the turn on a protected green arrow while the oncoming driver ran a red light.

The statutory framework assigns duties to both drivers, and the physical evidence determines how a jury allocates fault between them.

Building the Evidence File for an Intersection Collision Case

The strength of an intersection car accident claim in NJ depends on how quickly and thoroughly the evidence is gathered. Physical evidence degrades. Surveillance footage gets overwritten. Witness memories shift over time.

Police Reports and Signal Timing Records

The police report documents the officer's observations at the scene, witness statements, and in some cases, the officer's preliminary determination of fault. While the report itself is not dispositive in a civil lawsuit, it often becomes a starting point for both sides.

Signal timing records from the municipality or NJDOT may establish the exact cycle at the intersection, including the duration of each green, yellow, and red phase. Cross-referencing these records with the estimated time of the collision may help determine whether a driver's claim of a green light is consistent with the signal cycle.

Preservation Demands and Subpoenas

Surveillance footage from nearby businesses, traffic monitoring cameras, and dashcam recordings may be the most valuable evidence in an intersection collision case. An attorney may send preservation letters immediately after the crash to prevent the deletion of footage that cycles on short retention schedules. If voluntary preservation fails, a subpoena may compel production. Our team can assist with this process; contact our Paterson NJ personal injury lawyer for immediate help.

Accident Reconstruction

In cases where physical evidence and witness testimony conflict, an accident reconstruction professional may analyze vehicle damage, road markings, signal data, and event data recorder (EDR) information from the vehicles involved.

Modern vehicles record pre-crash data, including speed, brake application, steering input, and throttle position. This data, combined with the physical evidence, may allow a reconstruction professional to determine each driver's actions in the seconds before the collision with a level of detail that witness accounts alone do not provide.

FAQs for Intersection Car Accident NJ Claims

If I Had the Green Light, Is the Other Driver Automatically at Fault?

Not necessarily. A green light permits you to proceed, but New Jersey law conditions that permission on the safety of others. If you were exceeding the speed limit, distracted, or failed to observe a vehicle already in the intersection, a jury may assign you a percentage of fault under comparative negligence. The green light strengthens your position but does not make it absolute.

How Do I Prove the Other Driver Ran a Red Light?

Independent evidence is critical. Dashcam footage, traffic monitoring camera recordings, witness statements, and accident reconstruction analysis may all support or challenge each driver's account. Signal timing records from the municipality may also help determine whether the claimed signal status is consistent with the intersection's cycle at the time of the crash.

What if There Are No Witnesses and No Camera Footage?

Physical evidence may still tell the story. Vehicle damage patterns, point of impact, skid marks, debris fields, and event data recorder (EDR) information from either vehicle may allow an accident reconstruction professional to determine each driver's speed, direction, and braking behavior before the collision.

Does a Traffic Ticket Issued at the Scene Prove Fault in a Civil Case?

A traffic citation may be relevant evidence, but it does not automatically determine civil liability. The standard for a traffic ticket differs from the standard for negligence in a civil lawsuit. A jury may consider the citation along with all other evidence, but it is not bound by the officer's determination.

How Long Do I Have to File an Intersection Accident Lawsuit in NJ?

New Jersey's statute of limitations for personal injury claims is generally two years from the date of the accident, with some exceptions. Claims against government entities, including those involving intersection design or signal maintenance, require a notice of claim within 90 days. Acting promptly also increases the likelihood that critical evidence is preserved. Learn more about car accident lawyer timelines.

The Seconds Before Impact Define Your Intersection Accident Case in NJ

Intersection collisions compress the entire liability analysis into a handful of seconds. Who entered first? Who had the signal? Who was paying attention? Who had time to brake? The answers to those questions, supported by evidence gathered early and preserved carefully, determine how fault is allocated and what compensation may be available.

At Onal Injury Law, we approach intersection collision cases with the preparation these disputes demand. Our attorneys secure surveillance footage before it cycles, obtain signal timing records, and work with reconstruction professionals to build a factual record that withstands scrutiny. See how we can help on our New Jersey personal injury lawyer overview.

A professional in a suit writes at a desk beside a brass scales of justice and a gold desk lamp.
By john onal March 31, 2026
An NJ hit-and-run car accident can cause injuries, vehicle damage, and no information about the driver who caused it. The other vehicle is gone. There is no license plate, no insurance card, and no one to hold accountable at the scene.
A person wearing a black LS2 motorcycle helmet with a reflective visor, set against a blurred, warm-toned outdoor background.
By john onal March 31, 2026
New Jersey's motorcycle helmet law requires every rider and every passenger to wear a properly fitted, approved helmet on every ride.
A first-person view from a motorcycle handlebars, showing a paved road winding through a wooded landscape.
By john onal March 31, 2026
The injuries motorcyclists suffer most often in New Jersey tend to be more serious than what you'd see in a typical car crash because there's nothing between the rider and the road.
By john onal March 31, 2026
If you were an injured passenger in a New Jersey car accident, your medical bills typically go through PIP first, and then you may pursue additional damages depending on the severity of your injuries and the insurance policies involved. Passenger rights after a car accident in NJ start with a simple fact: passengers are almost never at fault. Unlike drivers, who may share blame under comparative negligence, a passenger had no control over the vehicle's speed, direction, or decision-making. That distinction gives injured passengers a stronger starting position than most other claimants in a New Jersey car accident case. The complication is not fault. It is figuring out which insurance policies apply, in what order, and whether the injuries qualify for compensation beyond what PIP covers. Recovery for an injured passenger may involve their own auto policy, a family member's policy, the driver's policy, the at-fault driver's liability coverage, or a combination of several. Free Consultation – Speak With a Lawyer Now Key Takeaways for Passenger Rights Car Accident NJ Claims Passengers are rarely assigned fault in a car accident, which means New Jersey's modified comparative negligence rule under N.J.S.A. 2A:15-5.1 typically does not reduce a passenger's recovery PIP coverage follows a priority hierarchy: the passenger's own policy pays first, then a resident family member's policy, then the policy on the vehicle the passenger was riding in A passenger may pursue a liability claim against the at-fault driver, even if that driver is a friend or family member, because the driver's insurance usually handles the defense and may pay compensation up to the policy limits The verbal threshold applies to passengers based on the tort option selected on the policy providing PIP, which may limit access to pain and suffering damages unless the injury meets one of six statutory categories under N.J.S.A. 39:6A-8 When multiple drivers share fault for the accident, the passenger may pursue liability claims against each at-fault driver's insurance Whose Insurance Pays First for a Passenger's Injuries in NJ? New Jersey's no-fault system requires each person to turn to their own PIP coverage first after an auto accident, regardless of fault. For passengers, this creates a priority hierarchy that determines which policy provides benefits. PIP coverage in New Jersey follows the person, not the vehicle. For passengers, three levels determine which policy pays first: The passenger's own auto policy . If the passenger owns a car and carries insurance, that policy is the primary source of PIP benefits. A resident family member's policy . If the passenger does not own a vehicle, a parent's or household member's auto insurance provides PIP. A college student riding with a friend, for example, may access PIP through a parent's policy if they still reside in the same household. The policy on the vehicle the passenger was riding in . This applies only when the passenger has no personal policy and no qualifying family member with coverage. Each level may carry different PIP limits, deductibles, and coverage selections. Identifying the correct primary policy is one of the first steps in a passenger injury claim, and filing under the wrong one may result in a denial that delays access to medical benefits. Get Answers About Your PIP & UM Coverage Learn more about New Jersey car accident lawyers. What Damages Can an Injured Passenger Recover in New Jersey? Recovery for an injured passenger may draw from multiple sources, each covering a different category of loss. Understanding where one source ends and the next begins helps prevent gaps in the claim. PIP Economic Benefits PIP provides the first layer of compensation, available regardless of fault. Under a standard New Jersey auto policy, PIP may cover: Medical expenses for treatment related to accident injuries, up to the selected policy limit (ranging from $15,000 on a basic policy to $250,000 on a standard policy) Income continuation benefits for lost wages, generally up to $100 per week with a cap of $5,200 Essential services benefits for household tasks the injured person may not be able to perform during recovery, generally up to $12 per day, with a cap of $4,380 These figures reflect common default selections, but the specific amounts depend on the coverage options the policyholder chose. A passenger covered under someone else's policy is bound by that policy's selections. Out-of-Pocket Losses Beyond PIP PIP does not cover every expense that follows a serious injury. Costs that fall outside PIP or exceed its limits become part of the broader damages claim. These may include: Copays, deductibles, and medical expenses that exceed the PIP limit Prescription costs, medical devices, and rehabilitation equipment Transportation to and from medical appointments Home modifications or assistance needed during an extended recovery Documenting these expenses as they occur strengthens the claim. Receipts, invoices, and records of mileage create a verifiable trail that supports the total damages calculation. Liability Damages Beyond PIP When the passenger's injuries support a liability claim against the at-fault driver, a broader range of damages becomes available. These damages fall into two categories: Economic damages include measurable financial losses that PIP did not fully cover, such as past and future medical expenses beyond PIP limits, long-term diminished earning capacity, and ongoing care costs that extend well past the initial recovery period. Non-economic damages address losses that do not carry a specific dollar figure. Depending on the applicable tort threshold, these may include physical pain and ongoing discomfort related to the injury, emotional distress and psychological impact, loss of enjoyment of life and the inability to participate in activities valued before the accident, and loss of consortium. Access to non-economic damages depends on whether the applicable policy carries the verbal threshold or the zero threshold, as discussed above. Wrongful Death and Survival Claims When a passenger dies as a result of injuries sustained in a car accident, New Jersey law provides two separate legal actions. A wrongful death claim, brought under N.J.S.A. 2A:31-1 , allows surviving dependents to recover financial losses caused by the death, including lost financial support, household services the deceased provided, and funeral and burial expenses. A survival action, brought on behalf of the deceased passenger's estate, addresses the pain, suffering, and losses the passenger experienced between the time of the injury and the time of death. These two claims serve different purposes and compensate different categories of loss, but they often proceed together in the same litigation. Explore our car accident lawyer services. Can a Passenger Sue for Pain and Suffering in New Jersey? Whether a passenger may pursue non-economic damages depends on the tort option selected on the policy providing PIP benefits. New Jersey drivers choose between two tort options when purchasing auto insurance under N.J.S.A. 39:6A-8 : The limitation on lawsuit option (verbal threshold) restricts the right to sue for non-economic damages unless the injury falls into one of six statutory categories: death, dismemberment, significant disfigurement or scarring, displaced fractures, loss of a fetus, or a permanent injury that has not healed to normal function and will not heal with further treatment. The no limitation on lawsuit option (zero threshold) preserves the full right to sue for pain and suffering regardless of injury severity. For passengers, the tort option that applies is typically the one selected on the policy providing their PIP benefits. This means a passenger may face the verbal threshold even though they had no control over the policy's terms. If the injury meets one of the six statutory categories, or if the applicable policy carries the zero threshold, the passenger may pursue a full liability claim for non-economic damages against the at-fault driver. What if the At-Fault Driver Is a Friend or Family Member? This is where many injured passengers hesitate. Filing a claim against someone you know feels personal. The instinct is to avoid conflict, absorb the medical bills, and move on. That instinct is understandable, but it misunderstands how the claim actually works. A liability claim after a car accident is not a personal financial demand against the driver. It is a claim against the driver's auto insurance policy. The insurance company pays the settlement or verdict, not the individual. The driver's premiums may be affected, but the driver does not write a check from a personal account to cover the passenger's medical bills or lost income. Avoiding the claim does not make the financial consequences of the injury disappear. Filing the liability claim is the mechanism New Jersey law provides for recovering those losses. Additionally, some auto insurance policies contain household exclusions that may limit or bar liability claims between members of the same household. Whether such an exclusion is enforceable depends on the specific policy language and applicable New Jersey case law. An attorney may review the policy language to determine whether the exclusion applies and whether alternative sources of recovery exist. What if Multiple Drivers Were at Fault? Many intersection and multi-vehicle collisions involve shared fault between two or more drivers. As a passenger, this situation often works in your favor. New Jersey's modified comparative negligence standard assigns a percentage of fault to each driver. The passenger, who was not operating either vehicle, typically bears no fault at all. This means the passenger may pursue liability claims against each at-fault driver's insurance policy, up to the limits of each policy. If Driver A is 60% at fault and Driver B is 40% at fault, the passenger may recover from both policies proportionally. When one driver is uninsured or underinsured, the passenger's own uninsured/underinsured motorist (UM/UIM) coverage, or the UM/UIM coverage on the vehicle the passenger was riding in, may fill the gap. The ability to pursue multiple policies is one of the reasons passenger injury claims in multi-vehicle accidents may involve complex coverage analysis across several carriers. What if the Driver Was Uninsured or Underinsured? If the at-fault driver has no liability insurance, the passenger may pursue an uninsured motorist (UM) claim through their own auto policy, a family member's policy, or the policy on the vehicle the passenger was riding in. UM/UIM coverage priority can be more policy-specific than PIP, depending on which policies apply and how their UM/UIM endorsements coordinate. If the at-fault driver carries some insurance but not enough to cover the passenger's losses, underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage may provide additional compensation. UIM coverage becomes available when the total liability limits on the at-fault driver's policies are less than the UIM limits on the injured person's applicable policy. In limited situations where no insurance coverage is available, a passenger may be able to seek benefits through the Unsatisfied Claim and Judgment Fund (UCJF) , administered through NJPLIGA, which has strict eligibility and notice requirements. What About Out-of-State Passengers Injured in New Jersey? New Jersey's Deemer Statute, N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.4 , can require certain out-of-state auto policies issued by insurers authorized (or affiliated) in New Jersey to provide New Jersey-required coverages in accidents that happen in New Jersey. The statute effectively reforms an out-of-state auto policy to include PIP coverage consistent with New Jersey requirements, as long as the insurer is authorized to do business in New Jersey. Whether the Deemer Statute affects a passenger depends on the passenger's status under the applicable policy and the specific eligibility rules, so coverage often requires a policy-by-policy analysis. Simply riding as a passenger in an out-of-state car being driven in New Jersey may not be enough to trigger the statute's protections. Out-of-state passengers injured in New Jersey face complex coverage questions that require careful analysis of which policies apply. Review comparative fault in NJ personal injury cases. FAQs for Passenger Rights Car Accident NJ Claims Does Being a Passenger Mean I Am Automatically Not at Fault? In the vast majority of cases, yes. Passengers do not control the vehicle and are not held to the duties that apply to drivers. In rare circumstances, a passenger's conduct, such as grabbing the steering wheel or distracting the driver in an extreme way, may lead to a fault allocation. These situations are uncommon, and the burden of proving passenger fault falls on the party raising it. What if I Was Not Wearing a Seatbelt? In New Jersey, the defense may argue that failing to wear a seatbelt increased certain injuries, and damages may be reduced for the portion of harm that could have been avoided with seatbelt use. Even for a passenger, the defense may try to reduce damages by showing the injuries were worse because a seatbelt was not used. Can I File a Claim if I Was Riding in an Uber or Lyft? Rideshare companies carry commercial liability policies that apply when the driver is engaged in a trip. These policies typically provide higher coverage limits than a personal auto policy. A passenger injured in a rideshare vehicle may pursue PIP through the standard priority hierarchy and a liability claim against the at-fault party, which may include the rideshare driver, another driver, or both. What if Both Drivers Blame Each Other and No One Admits Fault? As a passenger, you do not need to resolve the dispute between the drivers. You may pursue claims against both drivers' insurance policies. The jury or arbitrator assigns fault percentages, and your recovery comes from each policy proportionally. Disputed liability between the drivers does not prevent the passenger from pursuing compensation. How Long Does It Take to Resolve a Passenger Injury Claim in NJ? The timeline depends on the severity of the injuries, the number of insurance policies involved, and whether liability is disputed between the drivers. Claims involving a single at-fault driver with clear liability may resolve faster than multi-vehicle cases where several carriers are negotiating fault percentages. Liability disputes between drivers do not prevent the claim from moving forward, but they may affect how long it takes each insurer to finalize its share. Your Injuries Deserve the Same Attention Regardless of Who Was Driving Being a passenger does not make your injuries less serious, and it does not make your claim less valid. The discomfort of filing a claim against someone you know is real, but the claim moves through insurance channels, not personal ones, and the medical bills, the missed paychecks, and the recovery process are yours to manage either way. At Onal Injury Law, we handle passenger injury claims with the same preparation and accountability that defines every case we take. Our attorneys trace the coverage hierarchy, identify every applicable policy, and build the claim as though it will be tested at trial.
A white box truck driving on a curved, paved road surrounded by lush green trees.
By john onal March 31, 2026
A truck brake failure accident raises a different question than most collision cases.
A metallic gold Volvo semi-truck driving on a highway with a blurred background of trees.
By john onal March 31, 2026
Is the trucking company liable in a New Jersey truck accident? In many cases, the answer is yes, but it depends on the facts and the company's relationship to the driver and the truck.
A yellow and dark green Mitsubishi Fuso truck with a black cargo cover travels along a road against a mountainous backdrop.
By john onal March 31, 2026
Truck black box data can be some of the strongest evidence in a New Jersey truck accident case, especially when fault is disputed, and the trucking company's version of events keeps changing.
A bronze Lady Justice statue holding scales and a sword sits on a wooden desk in a dimly lit office.
By john onal March 31, 2026
The New Jersey personal injury trial process begins long before anyone enters a courtroom. Click here to read more about it.
Image of catastrophic injury
By john onal March 31, 2026
A catastrophic injury settlement in NJ depends on proving what the next 10, 20, or 40 years of care may cost, not just what treatment has cost so far.
Image of lawyer
By john onal March 31, 2026
The personal injury litigation process in NJ moves through distinct phases. When pre-suit negotiations stall and an insurance offer falls short, litigation may be the next step
CDL law truck accident case New Jersey
By Bruce Gunacti October 3, 2025
A new CDL law in 2025 could change how truck crash cases in New Jersey and New York are fought and won.
Motorcyclist sitting on a bike near a city road in New Jersey.
By Bruce Gunacti March 6, 2025
Need a motorcycle accident lawyer in New Jersey? Explore the top 10 attorneys who can help you secure compensation after a crash. Find expert legal representation today.