Brake Failures and Mechanical Defects in New Jersey Truck Accidents

A truck brake failure accident raises a different question than most collision cases. Instead of asking who made a driving error, the investigation asks why the equipment failed, who was responsible for maintaining it, and whether the failure was preventable.

Mechanical defect truck crashes in NJ raise questions that go beyond driver behavior. Brake system failures, tire blowouts, steering malfunctions, and coupling failures create situations where even an attentive, well-rested driver may not be able to prevent a catastrophic crash. When an 80,000-pound vehicle loses braking capacity on the Turnpike or I-78, the consequences for everyone in its path are severe.

An attorney who handles truck brake failure and mechanical defect cases may help identify whether the failure was caused by negligent maintenance, a defective part, or both, and pursue the responsible parties before critical evidence disappears.

Get a Free Consultation — You Pay Nothing Until We Win

Key Takeaways for Truck Brake Failure and Mechanical Defect Cases

  • Brake system failures are a common mechanical defect in commercial truck accidents, including air brake malfunctions, brake fade from overheating, and brakes that are out of adjustment
  • FMCSA regulations under 49 CFR Part 396 require every motor carrier to systematically inspect, repair, and maintain all commercial vehicles under its control, with parts and accessories in safe and proper operating condition at all times
  • Liability for a mechanical failure may extend to the motor carrier, the maintenance contractor, the parts manufacturer, and, in some cases, the leasing company, depending on who controlled the vehicle and who performed the work
  • Critical evidence in these cases, including maintenance logs, driver vehicle inspection reports (DVIRs), repair records, and the failed components themselves, is controlled by the carrier or contractor and may be lost if not preserved immediately
  • Product liability claims for defective truck parts follow a separate legal framework that does not require proving negligence, but the injured person still must prove that the product was defective, the defect existed when it left the manufacturer's control, and the defect caused the injury

Mechanical Failures That Cause New Jersey Truck Accidents

Not every truck accident is caused by a driving error. Some crashes trace directly to equipment that was not maintained, not inspected, or not designed to perform safely under the conditions it encountered.

Brake System Failures

Brake failures are a frequently cited mechanical defect in serious truck crashes. Most commercial trucks rely on air brake systems that operate differently from the hydraulic brakes in passenger vehicles. When air pressure drops below safe operating levels, the brakes may not engage with enough force to stop an 80,000-pound vehicle.

Common brake-related failures include:

  • Air brake malfunctions caused by leaks in the air lines, failed compressors, or contaminated air systems that reduce braking pressure
  • Brake fade from prolonged use on downhill grades, where repeated application generates heat that reduces the friction material's stopping power
  • Brakes out of adjustment, where the gap between the brake drum and the brake lining exceeds the allowable limit, reducing braking effectiveness and increasing stopping distance
  • ABS malfunctions that may prevent the antilock braking system from functioning properly during hard braking or on slippery surfaces

Brake deficiencies are among the most common out-of-service violations identified during roadside inspections, meaning these problems are frequently detectable before they cause a crash.

Tire Failures

Tire blowouts and tread separations may cause a driver to lose control, particularly at highway speeds. Contributing factors include underinflation, overloading, worn tread, defective retreads, and tires that have exceeded their service life. A front tire blowout on a tractor may pull the vehicle sharply to one side, while a trailer tire failure may cause the trailer to sway or jackknife.

Steering and Suspension Failures

Loss of power steering, worn steering components, and suspension failures may make the vehicle impossible to control during normal driving maneuvers. Axle failures and broken leaf springs may cause the vehicle to drop suddenly or veer unpredictably. These failures frequently trace back to worn components that a proper inspection program would have identified and replaced.

Coupling and Kingpin Failures

The connection between a tractor and its trailer relies on the kingpin and fifth wheel coupling. When this connection fails, the trailer may separate from the tractor entirely, creating an uncontrolled obstacle on the roadway. Coupling failures are often caused by worn or damaged kingpins, improperly latched fifth wheels, or failure to inspect the connection during the pre-trip check.

Talk to a New Jersey Truck Accident Lawyer Now

What Maintenance Standards Does Federal Law Require?

The FMCSA's inspection, repair, and maintenance regulations under 49 CFR Part 396 establish the baseline standard of care for every motor carrier operating commercial vehicles. Every motor carrier must systematically inspect, repair, and maintain all motor vehicles subject to its control, with parts and accessories in safe and proper operating condition at all times.

These requirements create a layered system of accountability:

  • Systematic maintenance programs require carriers to establish and follow regular schedules for inspecting and servicing every vehicle in their fleet, including frame assemblies, suspension systems, axles, wheels, rims, and steering systems
  • Record-keeping obligations require carriers to document inspections, repairs, and maintenance for each vehicle, and to keep those records while the vehicle is under their control and for a period after it leaves their control
  • Annual periodic inspections require every commercial vehicle to undergo a comprehensive inspection at least once every 12 months, covering all items in the FMCSA's minimum inspection standards
  • Driver vehicle inspection reports (DVIRs) generally require drivers to document safety-related defects or deficiencies they find, and carriers must address reported defects before the vehicle is operated again
  • Pre-operation repair requirements prohibit carriers from permitting a vehicle to operate until reported defects have been corrected

When a truck is involved in a crash, and the investigation reveals that brakes were out of adjustment, tires were worn beyond safe limits, or a steering component was flagged on a prior inspection but never repaired, these maintenance records become central evidence of the carrier's negligence.

Defective Parts vs. Negligent Maintenance: How to Tell the Difference

A brake system failure does not automatically mean the carrier neglected maintenance. The failure may trace to a defective component that was manufactured incorrectly, designed inadequately, or installed improperly. Distinguishing between a maintenance failure and a product defect is one of the most important early determinations in a mechanical defect truck crash case.

Negligent Maintenance Defective Product
What failed A component that was serviceable but not properly maintained, inspected, or replaced on schedule A component that was defective in design, manufacturing, or specifications when it left the manufacturer's control
Who is typically liable The motor carrier, the maintenance contractor, or both The parts manufacturer, distributor, or installer
What the claim requires Proof that the responsible party knew or should have known about the condition and failed to address it Proof that the product was defective and that the defect caused the injury, without requiring proof of negligence
Key evidence DVIRs, maintenance logs, repair records, inspection history, out-of-service violations Component testing, engineering analysis, NHTSA recall history, manufacturing records
Legal framework Negligence (duty, breach, causation, damages) Product liability under New Jersey law

In many cases, the answer is not one or the other. A marginally defective brake component that would have been caught during a proper inspection but was missed due to the carrier's inadequate maintenance program creates overlapping liability. Pursuing both theories allows the injured person to hold each responsible party accountable for its role in the failure.

Why the Distinction Affects the Value of the Claim

Identifying whether the failure was caused by negligent maintenance, a defective product, or both directly affects the number of liable parties and the total insurance coverage available.

A claim limited to the carrier's maintenance failures draws from the carrier's commercial liability policy. Adding a product liability claim against the manufacturer opens access to a separate policy with its own limits. When a maintenance contractor is also involved, a third policy may apply.

Beyond coverage, the type of failure may also reveal systemic problems. A carrier with a pattern of deferred brake repairs across its fleet, or a manufacturer facing multiple complaints about the same component, presents a stronger case for the full scope of damages than an isolated incident with a single liable party.

Who May Be Liable for a Mechanical Defect Truck Crash in NJ?

Liability in a mechanical failure case depends on who controlled the vehicle, who performed the maintenance, and who manufactured the failed component.

  • The motor carrier bears primary responsibility for the condition of every vehicle in its fleet under 49 CFR Part 396. A carrier that fails to maintain a systematic inspection and repair program, ignores known defects, or puts a vehicle with documented problems back on the road may be directly liable for the resulting crash.
  • The maintenance contractor may be liable when the carrier outsources vehicle maintenance, and the contractor performs negligent repairs, fails to identify defects during scheduled service, or uses substandard replacement parts. The carrier's decision to outsource does not eliminate its own regulatory obligation, but it does create an additional liable party.
  • The parts manufacturer or distributor may be liable under product liability when a defective component caused the failure. This includes the manufacturer of the specific part (brake assembly, tire, steering component) and, in some cases, the distributor or installer.
  • The leasing company may be liable when the truck is leased rather than owned, and the lease agreement assigns maintenance responsibility to the lessor. If the leasing company was responsible for keeping the vehicle in a safe condition and failed to do so, it may share liability for the mechanical failure.

Identifying the liable parties early is critical because each may have separate insurance coverage, and the total available compensation depends on how many policies are in play.

Contact Our Truck Accident Team — Free Case Review

Warning Signs That a Truck Had Mechanical Problems Before the Crash

Mechanical failures rarely happen without warning. In many cases, the signs of an impending brake failure, tire blowout, or steering malfunction were present for days or weeks before the crash.

Warning signs that may appear in inspection records, driver reports, or post-crash analysis include:

  • Low air pressure warnings or frequent activation of the low-pressure alarm in the cab
  • Pulling to one side during braking, indicating uneven brake wear or a stuck caliper
  • Unusual vibration, shimmy, or wandering at highway speeds, suggesting tire or suspension problems
  • Visible tire damage, including bulging sidewalls, uneven tread wear, or exposed belt material
  • Grinding or squealing sounds during braking, indicating worn friction material
  • Excessive steering play or clunking sounds during turns, suggesting worn steering components

If the driver reported any of these conditions on a DVIR and the carrier failed to address them before the next trip, the maintenance records become direct evidence of negligence. If the driver failed to report known conditions, the driver's own negligence may also be a factor in the liability analysis.

Evidence That May Disappear After a Mechanical Failure Crash

Truck brake failure and mechanical defect cases are uniquely vulnerable to evidence loss. The truck itself is the primary piece of evidence, and the parties who control it, the carrier, the insurer, and the repair facility, have strong incentives to return it to service or dispose of it quickly.

Critical evidence that must be preserved includes:

  • The failed components themselves, which may need expert inspection and testing
  • Maintenance and repair records for the vehicle, including DVIRs, work orders, and parts purchase records
  • The carrier's overall maintenance program documentation, which may reveal systemic deficiencies
  • ECM/black box data recording pre-crash speed, braking inputs, and engine performance
  • Roadside inspection history from the FMCSA's Safety Measurement System (SMS) database

An attorney may issue spoliation letters to the carrier, maintenance contractor, and repair facility within days of the crash to prevent the destruction or alteration of these records and components. In some cases, a court order may be necessary to compel the preservation of the truck itself until an independent inspection can be completed.

FAQ for Truck Brake Failure and Mechanical Defect Cases

How Do Investigators Prove Brakes Failed Before the Crash?

Post-crash brake inspections measure pushrod stroke, lining thickness, drum condition, and air system integrity. Brake adjustment measurements taken at the scene or during the post-crash inspection may reveal whether the brakes were out of adjustment at the time of the collision. ECM data showing the driver's braking inputs, combined with the vehicle's actual deceleration rate, may demonstrate that the brakes did not respond as they should have.

Does a Recall on the Failed Part Strengthen My Case?

An NHTSA recall or safety investigation may provide evidence that the manufacturer knew or should have known about the defect. If the carrier or owner received a recall notice and failed to complete the required repair, that failure may support both a negligent maintenance claim against the carrier and a product liability claim against the manufacturer.

What if the Trucking Company Already Repaired or Scrapped the Truck?

If the carrier repaired or destroyed the vehicle before the injured person had an opportunity to inspect it, this may constitute spoliation of evidence. New Jersey courts may impose sanctions, including an adverse inference instruction that tells the jury the destroyed evidence would have been unfavorable to the carrier. Acting quickly to issue preservation demands is the most effective way to prevent this outcome.

Can I Pursue a Claim if the Driver Also Made an Error?

Yes. Mechanical failure and driver error are not mutually exclusive. A driver who was speeding may have been unable to stop because the brakes were also out of adjustment. New Jersey's comparative negligence standard allows the jury to allocate fault among all contributing parties, including the driver, the carrier, and the manufacturer. The injured person may recover as long as their own fault does not exceed 50%.

The Failure May Have Been Preventable, and the Evidence Could Prove It

A truck brake failure or mechanical defect crash is not an accident in the ordinary sense. It is the predictable result of maintenance that was deferred, inspections that were skipped, or components that were defective from the start. The evidence that proves it, the maintenance logs, the inspection records, and the failed components, exists in the hands of the parties who had the duty to prevent the failure.

At Onal Injury Law, we move quickly to preserve that evidence and build the case before it disappears. Our attorneys secure the failed components, obtain the carrier's maintenance records, and work with engineering and reconstruction professionals to determine exactly what failed, why it failed, and who bears responsibility.

Book a Free Consultation — Call 201 335 6788
A professional in a suit writes at a desk beside a brass scales of justice and a gold desk lamp.
By john onal March 31, 2026
An NJ hit-and-run car accident can cause injuries, vehicle damage, and no information about the driver who caused it. The other vehicle is gone. There is no license plate, no insurance card, and no one to hold accountable at the scene.
Two cars are severely damaged after a collision, with debris on the road and an orange traffic cone nearby.
By john onal March 31, 2026
If you were an injured passenger in a New Jersey car accident, your medical bills typically go through PIP first, and then you may pursue additional damages depending on the severity of your injuries and the insurance policies involved.
A person wearing a black LS2 motorcycle helmet with a reflective visor, set against a blurred, warm-toned outdoor background.
By john onal March 31, 2026
New Jersey's motorcycle helmet law requires every rider and every passenger to wear a properly fitted, approved helmet on every ride.
A first-person view from a motorcycle handlebars, showing a paved road winding through a wooded landscape.
By john onal March 31, 2026
The injuries motorcyclists suffer most often in New Jersey tend to be more serious than what you'd see in a typical car crash because there's nothing between the rider and the road.
By john onal March 31, 2026
If you were an injured passenger in a New Jersey car accident, your medical bills typically go through PIP first, and then you may pursue additional damages depending on the severity of your injuries and the insurance policies involved. Passenger rights after a car accident in NJ start with a simple fact: passengers are almost never at fault. Unlike drivers, who may share blame under comparative negligence, a passenger had no control over the vehicle's speed, direction, or decision-making. That distinction gives injured passengers a stronger starting position than most other claimants in a New Jersey car accident case. The complication is not fault. It is figuring out which insurance policies apply, in what order, and whether the injuries qualify for compensation beyond what PIP covers. Recovery for an injured passenger may involve their own auto policy, a family member's policy, the driver's policy, the at-fault driver's liability coverage, or a combination of several. Free Consultation – Speak With a Lawyer Now Key Takeaways for Passenger Rights Car Accident NJ Claims Passengers are rarely assigned fault in a car accident, which means New Jersey's modified comparative negligence rule under N.J.S.A. 2A:15-5.1 typically does not reduce a passenger's recovery PIP coverage follows a priority hierarchy: the passenger's own policy pays first, then a resident family member's policy, then the policy on the vehicle the passenger was riding in A passenger may pursue a liability claim against the at-fault driver, even if that driver is a friend or family member, because the driver's insurance usually handles the defense and may pay compensation up to the policy limits The verbal threshold applies to passengers based on the tort option selected on the policy providing PIP, which may limit access to pain and suffering damages unless the injury meets one of six statutory categories under N.J.S.A. 39:6A-8 When multiple drivers share fault for the accident, the passenger may pursue liability claims against each at-fault driver's insurance Whose Insurance Pays First for a Passenger's Injuries in NJ? New Jersey's no-fault system requires each person to turn to their own PIP coverage first after an auto accident, regardless of fault. For passengers, this creates a priority hierarchy that determines which policy provides benefits. PIP coverage in New Jersey follows the person, not the vehicle. For passengers, three levels determine which policy pays first: The passenger's own auto policy . If the passenger owns a car and carries insurance, that policy is the primary source of PIP benefits. A resident family member's policy . If the passenger does not own a vehicle, a parent's or household member's auto insurance provides PIP. A college student riding with a friend, for example, may access PIP through a parent's policy if they still reside in the same household. The policy on the vehicle the passenger was riding in . This applies only when the passenger has no personal policy and no qualifying family member with coverage. Each level may carry different PIP limits, deductibles, and coverage selections. Identifying the correct primary policy is one of the first steps in a passenger injury claim, and filing under the wrong one may result in a denial that delays access to medical benefits. Get Answers About Your PIP & UM Coverage Learn more about New Jersey car accident lawyers. What Damages Can an Injured Passenger Recover in New Jersey? Recovery for an injured passenger may draw from multiple sources, each covering a different category of loss. Understanding where one source ends and the next begins helps prevent gaps in the claim. PIP Economic Benefits PIP provides the first layer of compensation, available regardless of fault. Under a standard New Jersey auto policy, PIP may cover: Medical expenses for treatment related to accident injuries, up to the selected policy limit (ranging from $15,000 on a basic policy to $250,000 on a standard policy) Income continuation benefits for lost wages, generally up to $100 per week with a cap of $5,200 Essential services benefits for household tasks the injured person may not be able to perform during recovery, generally up to $12 per day, with a cap of $4,380 These figures reflect common default selections, but the specific amounts depend on the coverage options the policyholder chose. A passenger covered under someone else's policy is bound by that policy's selections. Out-of-Pocket Losses Beyond PIP PIP does not cover every expense that follows a serious injury. Costs that fall outside PIP or exceed its limits become part of the broader damages claim. These may include: Copays, deductibles, and medical expenses that exceed the PIP limit Prescription costs, medical devices, and rehabilitation equipment Transportation to and from medical appointments Home modifications or assistance needed during an extended recovery Documenting these expenses as they occur strengthens the claim. Receipts, invoices, and records of mileage create a verifiable trail that supports the total damages calculation. Liability Damages Beyond PIP When the passenger's injuries support a liability claim against the at-fault driver, a broader range of damages becomes available. These damages fall into two categories: Economic damages include measurable financial losses that PIP did not fully cover, such as past and future medical expenses beyond PIP limits, long-term diminished earning capacity, and ongoing care costs that extend well past the initial recovery period. Non-economic damages address losses that do not carry a specific dollar figure. Depending on the applicable tort threshold, these may include physical pain and ongoing discomfort related to the injury, emotional distress and psychological impact, loss of enjoyment of life and the inability to participate in activities valued before the accident, and loss of consortium. Access to non-economic damages depends on whether the applicable policy carries the verbal threshold or the zero threshold, as discussed above. Wrongful Death and Survival Claims When a passenger dies as a result of injuries sustained in a car accident, New Jersey law provides two separate legal actions. A wrongful death claim, brought under N.J.S.A. 2A:31-1 , allows surviving dependents to recover financial losses caused by the death, including lost financial support, household services the deceased provided, and funeral and burial expenses. A survival action, brought on behalf of the deceased passenger's estate, addresses the pain, suffering, and losses the passenger experienced between the time of the injury and the time of death. These two claims serve different purposes and compensate different categories of loss, but they often proceed together in the same litigation. Explore our car accident lawyer services. Can a Passenger Sue for Pain and Suffering in New Jersey? Whether a passenger may pursue non-economic damages depends on the tort option selected on the policy providing PIP benefits. New Jersey drivers choose between two tort options when purchasing auto insurance under N.J.S.A. 39:6A-8 : The limitation on lawsuit option (verbal threshold) restricts the right to sue for non-economic damages unless the injury falls into one of six statutory categories: death, dismemberment, significant disfigurement or scarring, displaced fractures, loss of a fetus, or a permanent injury that has not healed to normal function and will not heal with further treatment. The no limitation on lawsuit option (zero threshold) preserves the full right to sue for pain and suffering regardless of injury severity. For passengers, the tort option that applies is typically the one selected on the policy providing their PIP benefits. This means a passenger may face the verbal threshold even though they had no control over the policy's terms. If the injury meets one of the six statutory categories, or if the applicable policy carries the zero threshold, the passenger may pursue a full liability claim for non-economic damages against the at-fault driver. What if the At-Fault Driver Is a Friend or Family Member? This is where many injured passengers hesitate. Filing a claim against someone you know feels personal. The instinct is to avoid conflict, absorb the medical bills, and move on. That instinct is understandable, but it misunderstands how the claim actually works. A liability claim after a car accident is not a personal financial demand against the driver. It is a claim against the driver's auto insurance policy. The insurance company pays the settlement or verdict, not the individual. The driver's premiums may be affected, but the driver does not write a check from a personal account to cover the passenger's medical bills or lost income. Avoiding the claim does not make the financial consequences of the injury disappear. Filing the liability claim is the mechanism New Jersey law provides for recovering those losses. Additionally, some auto insurance policies contain household exclusions that may limit or bar liability claims between members of the same household. Whether such an exclusion is enforceable depends on the specific policy language and applicable New Jersey case law. An attorney may review the policy language to determine whether the exclusion applies and whether alternative sources of recovery exist. What if Multiple Drivers Were at Fault? Many intersection and multi-vehicle collisions involve shared fault between two or more drivers. As a passenger, this situation often works in your favor. New Jersey's modified comparative negligence standard assigns a percentage of fault to each driver. The passenger, who was not operating either vehicle, typically bears no fault at all. This means the passenger may pursue liability claims against each at-fault driver's insurance policy, up to the limits of each policy. If Driver A is 60% at fault and Driver B is 40% at fault, the passenger may recover from both policies proportionally. When one driver is uninsured or underinsured, the passenger's own uninsured/underinsured motorist (UM/UIM) coverage, or the UM/UIM coverage on the vehicle the passenger was riding in, may fill the gap. The ability to pursue multiple policies is one of the reasons passenger injury claims in multi-vehicle accidents may involve complex coverage analysis across several carriers. What if the Driver Was Uninsured or Underinsured? If the at-fault driver has no liability insurance, the passenger may pursue an uninsured motorist (UM) claim through their own auto policy, a family member's policy, or the policy on the vehicle the passenger was riding in. UM/UIM coverage priority can be more policy-specific than PIP, depending on which policies apply and how their UM/UIM endorsements coordinate. If the at-fault driver carries some insurance but not enough to cover the passenger's losses, underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage may provide additional compensation. UIM coverage becomes available when the total liability limits on the at-fault driver's policies are less than the UIM limits on the injured person's applicable policy. In limited situations where no insurance coverage is available, a passenger may be able to seek benefits through the Unsatisfied Claim and Judgment Fund (UCJF) , administered through NJPLIGA, which has strict eligibility and notice requirements. What About Out-of-State Passengers Injured in New Jersey? New Jersey's Deemer Statute, N.J.S.A. 17:28-1.4 , can require certain out-of-state auto policies issued by insurers authorized (or affiliated) in New Jersey to provide New Jersey-required coverages in accidents that happen in New Jersey. The statute effectively reforms an out-of-state auto policy to include PIP coverage consistent with New Jersey requirements, as long as the insurer is authorized to do business in New Jersey. Whether the Deemer Statute affects a passenger depends on the passenger's status under the applicable policy and the specific eligibility rules, so coverage often requires a policy-by-policy analysis. Simply riding as a passenger in an out-of-state car being driven in New Jersey may not be enough to trigger the statute's protections. Out-of-state passengers injured in New Jersey face complex coverage questions that require careful analysis of which policies apply. Review comparative fault in NJ personal injury cases. FAQs for Passenger Rights Car Accident NJ Claims Does Being a Passenger Mean I Am Automatically Not at Fault? In the vast majority of cases, yes. Passengers do not control the vehicle and are not held to the duties that apply to drivers. In rare circumstances, a passenger's conduct, such as grabbing the steering wheel or distracting the driver in an extreme way, may lead to a fault allocation. These situations are uncommon, and the burden of proving passenger fault falls on the party raising it. What if I Was Not Wearing a Seatbelt? In New Jersey, the defense may argue that failing to wear a seatbelt increased certain injuries, and damages may be reduced for the portion of harm that could have been avoided with seatbelt use. Even for a passenger, the defense may try to reduce damages by showing the injuries were worse because a seatbelt was not used. Can I File a Claim if I Was Riding in an Uber or Lyft? Rideshare companies carry commercial liability policies that apply when the driver is engaged in a trip. These policies typically provide higher coverage limits than a personal auto policy. A passenger injured in a rideshare vehicle may pursue PIP through the standard priority hierarchy and a liability claim against the at-fault party, which may include the rideshare driver, another driver, or both. What if Both Drivers Blame Each Other and No One Admits Fault? As a passenger, you do not need to resolve the dispute between the drivers. You may pursue claims against both drivers' insurance policies. The jury or arbitrator assigns fault percentages, and your recovery comes from each policy proportionally. Disputed liability between the drivers does not prevent the passenger from pursuing compensation. How Long Does It Take to Resolve a Passenger Injury Claim in NJ? The timeline depends on the severity of the injuries, the number of insurance policies involved, and whether liability is disputed between the drivers. Claims involving a single at-fault driver with clear liability may resolve faster than multi-vehicle cases where several carriers are negotiating fault percentages. Liability disputes between drivers do not prevent the claim from moving forward, but they may affect how long it takes each insurer to finalize its share. Your Injuries Deserve the Same Attention Regardless of Who Was Driving Being a passenger does not make your injuries less serious, and it does not make your claim less valid. The discomfort of filing a claim against someone you know is real, but the claim moves through insurance channels, not personal ones, and the medical bills, the missed paychecks, and the recovery process are yours to manage either way. At Onal Injury Law, we handle passenger injury claims with the same preparation and accountability that defines every case we take. Our attorneys trace the coverage hierarchy, identify every applicable policy, and build the claim as though it will be tested at trial.
A metallic gold Volvo semi-truck driving on a highway with a blurred background of trees.
By john onal March 31, 2026
Is the trucking company liable in a New Jersey truck accident? In many cases, the answer is yes, but it depends on the facts and the company's relationship to the driver and the truck.
A yellow and dark green Mitsubishi Fuso truck with a black cargo cover travels along a road against a mountainous backdrop.
By john onal March 31, 2026
Truck black box data can be some of the strongest evidence in a New Jersey truck accident case, especially when fault is disputed, and the trucking company's version of events keeps changing.
A bronze Lady Justice statue holding scales and a sword sits on a wooden desk in a dimly lit office.
By john onal March 31, 2026
The New Jersey personal injury trial process begins long before anyone enters a courtroom. Click here to read more about it.
Image of catastrophic injury
By john onal March 31, 2026
A catastrophic injury settlement in NJ depends on proving what the next 10, 20, or 40 years of care may cost, not just what treatment has cost so far.
Image of lawyer
By john onal March 31, 2026
The personal injury litigation process in NJ moves through distinct phases. When pre-suit negotiations stall and an insurance offer falls short, litigation may be the next step
CDL law truck accident case New Jersey
By Bruce Gunacti October 3, 2025
A new CDL law in 2025 could change how truck crash cases in New Jersey and New York are fought and won.
Motorcyclist sitting on a bike near a city road in New Jersey.
By Bruce Gunacti March 6, 2025
Need a motorcycle accident lawyer in New Jersey? Explore the top 10 attorneys who can help you secure compensation after a crash. Find expert legal representation today.